Nanonets vs Rossum: which one for your invoices?
Both are accounts-payable platforms rather than converters. Nanonets starts with per-page tiers and trainable models you can set up yourself; Rossum is sold as an enterprise contract built around a human review queue and a managed integration into your ERP. Choose Nanonets for an accounts-payable workflow with approvals, not just a file; choose Rossum for large AP teams that need human-in-the-loop validation and audit.
Both products were checked on 22 September 2026 against the vendors' own public pages (nanonets.com, rossum.ai). We describe what each is built for and how it charges, and link to the vendor rather than quote figures that go out of date. Neither vendor paid to appear here and we earn nothing if you choose one. The third column is our own product, written to the same standard.
Side by side
| Nanonets | Rossum | Invoices to Spreadsheets | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | An accounts-payable workflow with approvals, not just a file | Large AP teams that need human-in-the-loop validation and audit | A folder of mixed PDFs, scans and phone photos you need as one checked spreadsheet |
| How it works | Trainable AI models plus workflow automation | Enterprise document platform with a review queue | AI extraction with the original page beside every value for review |
| Pricing model | Per-page tiers rising to an enterprise quote | Quote-based, sold as an enterprise contract | Flat monthly plans by document count, after a no-card trial |
| Where the data lands | Your ERP or accounting system, or an export | Your ERP, via a managed integration | A table organised by project, exported to Excel or CSV |
Choose Nanonets when
It is the better fit for an accounts-payable workflow with approvals, not just a file. How it works: trainable AI models plus workflow automation. The data ends up in your ERP or accounting system, or an export.
Choose Rossum when
It is the better fit for large AP teams that need human-in-the-loop validation and audit. How it works: enterprise document platform with a review queue. The data ends up in your ERP, via a managed integration.
When neither is the right shape
Both are more than some jobs need. If what you have is a folder of supplier invoices from different suppliers — PDFs, scans, photos taken on a phone — and what you want is one spreadsheet you can trust, Invoices to Spreadsheets does only that: every invoice and its line items in an editable table organised by project, each value shown beside the original page so you can check it, exported to Excel or CSV. It does not post into accounting software, and it is new, without the years of production history these products have. Try one invoice free, without an account.
What is the main difference between Nanonets and Rossum?
Both are accounts-payable platforms rather than converters. Nanonets starts with per-page tiers and trainable models you can set up yourself; Rossum is sold as an enterprise contract built around a human review queue and a managed integration into your ERP.
How do Nanonets and Rossum charge?
Nanonets: per-page tiers rising to an enterprise quote. Rossum: quote-based, sold as an enterprise contract. We describe the pricing model rather than quote figures, because figures change; check each vendor's pricing page for current prices.
Is there an alternative to Nanonets and Rossum if I just want a spreadsheet?
If the job is a folder of supplier invoices — PDFs, scans and phone photos from different suppliers — that you need as one checked spreadsheet, Invoices to Spreadsheets does only that: an editable table of every invoice and its line items, each value checked beside the original page, exported to Excel or CSV. It does not post into accounting software or run approval workflows.
7 days · 50 documents · No card needed